The Life of Honma ‘Kunzan’ Junji (本間「薫山」順治)

Finishing my translation of Honma’s entire Appraisal Diary (Kantō Hibi Shō, 鑑刀日々抄) that he maintained from 1969 to 1987, which turned out to turn into 10! volumes, I thought it would be interesting for my readers to learn how he actually ended up becoming one of the most important figures in the 20th century Japanese sword world. So, with deepest respect, I am presenting here a short biography of the man, the legend, Honma Sensei.

Honma Junji, pen name Kunzan, was born on April 16, Meiji 37 (明治, 1904), in what is now the city of Sakata (酒田), Yamagata Prefecture, into a very wealthy family. The Honma (本間) of Sakata were merchants and one of the largest private landholders in Japan. Their first generation was Honma Motomitsu (本間原光, 1674–1740), a buisness savant, who opened his first store at the age of 16. Well, the Honma family can actually trace back their origins to end of the Heian and beginning of the Kamakura period, but elaborating on that would of course be overkill for this article. Thus, back to Junji.

Junji’s father was Honma Keiji (本間敬治), who, originally from the Hattori (服部) familiy, had married Sunao (すなを), the daughter of Mitsuteru (本間光輝, 1854–1922), the seventh generation Honma main line. And here is where his “sword fate” already began. Although Junji’s grandfather Mitsuteru was not so much into swords, his son Mitsuya (本間光弥, 1876–1929), the eighth generation Honma, was. However, the greatest sword collector within the later Honma family was Mitsuya’s father, Junji’s great-grandfather, Mitsuyoshi (本間光美, 1836–1913), who had amassed about 2,000 swords at the time of his passing. Mitsuyoshi was at the right time at the right place, if you will: The Meiji Restoration hit in 1868, the ban on wearing swords in public was issued in 1876, former Samurai were struggling financially, and Mitsuyoshi had money, lots of it. Honma once wrote about family stories that were shared with him that many former Samurai from near and far were visiting the Honma residence, asking Mitsuyoshi to please buy their swords as they were in need of cash. Incidentally, the most priced blades of Mitsuyoshi were a signed Sukezane (助真) and a signed Mitsutada (光忠). Also Junji’s paternal grandfather Hattori Yasō (服部弥惣) was into swords. Honma mentioned that Yasō was even obsessed with them, and, as a Samurai retainer of the Shōnai fief (庄内藩), he became the foremost local expert on, and appraiser of Kotō blades.

So, this was the situation Junji was born into. However, he didn’t have a chance to learn directly from his paternal grandfather Yasō as he passed away when Junji was a young boy, and he also did not receive any training from his Honma great-grandfather Mitsuyoshi, only remembering sitting next to him as a kid, observing how he studied blades. Maybe he learned a little by osmosis… Well, even as an early teenager, Honma only once in a while had a chance to look at blades that were in his uncle Mitsuya’s collection, but no one really taught him anything in a structured manner, except for etiquette, handling, and maintenance (teire). It all began when he entered Kokugakuin University (國學院大學), Tōkyō, in 1923, where he studied Japanese literature and Japanese art history, and also attended many Japanese history lessons, where he met professors and made the connections that later led to him entering the Ministry of Education.

Now, most important connection in terms of swords was his Japanese literature professor, Mitsuya Shigematsu (三矢重松, 1872–1923), who came from a family of Shōnai fief Samurai retainers, like his paternal grandfather did, and they were even remotely related. Shigematsu’s younger brother namely, Mitsuya Miyamatsu (三矢宮松, 1880–1959), was an official with the Imperial Household Agency and a well-known sword connoisseur. It was Miyamatsu who, in view of Junji being from a collateral branch of the Honma family and never taking over the family business, and in view of his love of Japanese art and history, suggested he should actually go into the sword field.

At that time, the passing on of sword knowledge was not in critical danger per se as there was actually a momentum created by sword clubs being founded and by once again more and more related craftsmen being trained. However, the then sword experts were getting older, and the old Sensei were passing away left and right, and what was needed was someone preferrably with a “neutral” and academic, non-dealer or craftsman background, if you will, with the right passion for the art, who can be trained from a young age on, and who also has what it takes to take on a leadership role. Exactly 100 years later now, exactly the same situation, but I digress… In any case, Miyamatsu was convinced that person was the 20-years-young Honma Junji, and so were also Honma’s father and his Honma main line uncle and grandfather, who supported him as well. So, through recommendation of Miyamatsu, Honma was formally taken under the wing as a sword student by Kōzu Haku (神津伯, 1872–1951).

Kōzu Haku was an engineer with the Hydrographic Department of the Imperial Japanese Navy by trade, but had been the foremost student of Imamura ‘Chōga’ Nagayoshi (今村長賀, 1837–1910), former sword appraiser to the Imperial Museums of Tōkyō and Nara, and later in charge of the swords in possession of the Imperial Household Agency. Nagayoshi was a former Samurai from Tosa, who had participated in the Boshin War, and who was trained sword-wise by the Hon’ami (本阿弥) family. In short, Honma’s educational lineage was Hon’ami → Imamura → Kōzu.

From now on until his graduation from Kokugakuin University in 1928, Honma was not only studying with Kōzu on a weekly basis, often even two or three times a week, he also religiously attended the meetings of the sword clubs Chūō Tōken Kai (中央刀剣会, est. 1900) and Tsukiji Tōken Kai (築地刀剣会). Incidentally, someone once went through the records of both clubs and learned that from 1925 to 1929, Honma’s name not only was on the list of attendees for virtually every single month, it was also always on the list of who scored first and second rank at their monthly Nyūsatsu Kantei.

Through these activities, Honma made new contacts and met new sword teachers and supporters. For example, Sakakibara ‘Tekken’ Hiroyasu (榊原「鉄硯」浩逸, 1855–1937), a Boston-trained engineer and important figure in the early days of the Japanese railway system, who, after retirement, dedicated the rest of his life to calligraphy, painting, poetry, and swords. Another was statesman and prime minister Inukai ‘Bokudō’ Tsuyoshi (犬養「木堂」毅, 1855–1932), who was also a sword collector and like Sakakibara and founding member of the Chūō Tōken Kai. Further important contacts that soon became close friends of Honma were, just to name a few, statesman Count Itō Miyoji (伊東巳代治, 1857–1934), Daimyō son and sword expert Matsudaira Yorihira (松平頼平, 1858–1929), polititian and businessman Yamamoto Teijirō (山本悌二郎, 1870–1973), Marquis Hosokawa Moritatsu (細川護立, 1883–1970) the 16th generation of the Higo Hosokawa main line, and entrepreneur Nakajima Kiyoichi (中島喜代一, 1890–1947). All these people maintained renowned sword collection and regularly brought cherished blades to said sword club meetings for members to study, the best of which of course reserved for invitation only at their homes, and Honma saw them all…

After graduating in 1928, and through recommendation of Mitsuya Miyamatsu, and historian Ogino Nakasaburō (荻野仲三郎, 1870–1947) and art historian Fujikake Shizuya (藤懸静也, 1881–1958), whose classes he had taken, Honma landed a job as a researcher for what was referred to as National Treasures Survey Office of the Religious Affairs Bureau of the Ministry of Education, placed within the then Imperial Museum, Ueno. In short, he was examining objects that were vetted for Kokuhō and Jūyō-Bijutsuhin designations. Not only was he in charge of drafting the initial paperwork for each object, he was also investigating objects in private estates and such that were owned by temples and shrines, in the process of which he learned a great deal and made further important contacts, and that was his job until the end of WWII. That is, Kokuhō and Jūyō-Bijutsuhin designations were still carried out throughout the entire time of the war. Also in 1928, Honma had married his wife, whose aunt was married to Mitsuya Miyamatsu, and in 1932, their son Toshio (本間紀男, 1932–2015) was born, who later became a celebrated sculptor, who, BTW, made Junji’s bust that is installed at The Sword Museum of the NBTHK.

After the war, the Imperial Museum became what is now the Tōkyō National Museum, and Honma was named head of its Research Department. He once wrote that the museum became an institution under the juristiction of the Ministry of Education, and as he continued to work there on matters related to Kokuhō and Jūyō-Bijutsuhin, not much of his work actually changed in all of this. As much as he wanted, now as a department head, Honma could not just focus on swords, so he put Satō ‘Kanzan’ Kan’ichi (佐藤「寒山」貫一, 1907–1978) in charge of that. Kanzan had also graduated from Kokugakuin University, whose captain of the Kendō club he was, and was, like Honma, a researcher for the National Treasures Survey Office. Apart from that, Kanzan was also from Yamagata Prefecture, from the town of Tsuruoka (鶴岡), just 20 km (13 miles) south of Honma’s home town of Sakata.

Well, of course the most pressing issue of the day was the “sword hunt” carried out by the occupation forces, i.e., after Japan accepting the Potsdam Declaration in July of 1945, the country was required to surrender all weapons to the GHQ, and the aforementioned Nakajima Kiyoichi was the first, who gave Honma a head up that this will also include swords. Shocked, Honma immediately strategized with Satō about how to preserve the Nihontō by having their value recognized as works of art and as cultural objects, not as mere weapons. Satō Kanzan once wrote that this was actually their full-time occupation at that time, exhausting every avenue and petitioning with the GHQ in many ways. Just for the timeline, after said acceptance, the Japanese Home Ministry followed through right away and prohibited the civilian possession of swords in September of 1945, and in October of the same year, the GHQ issued an order that all swords must be handed over to the US Army. As a result, all confiscated swords that were not taken out of the country ended up in the US Eighth Army Ordnance Supply Depot in Akabane (赤羽), Kita Ward, Tōkyō, for the time being, on the basis of which they became colloquially known as Akabane-tō (赤羽刀).

One of the persons Honma was approaching was Col. Carol Victor Cadwell Sr. (1898–1972), a member of the Military Police Corps and Provost Marshal General of the Eighth Army. Very lucky for our field, Col. Cadwell was receptive and understood what was at stake, but it was not an easy journey for all involved. First, the GHQ wanted to limit the “permitted” swords to Kokuhō and Jūyō-Bijutsuhin, quasi: “That is what you want, National Treasures and Important Art Objects. Its right there in the name. And you were part of their designation process in the first place, Dr. Honma.” Honma of course replied this list is by far not exhaustive, and there are many swords that are worthy of preservation for various reasons that remain below the criteria for these objects. After all persistent negotiating, and assisted with this by Col. Cadwell, the GHQ made the concession that “any sword which, when examined by an expert, is found to possess artistic value in at least one aspect, can be declared an art object and does no longer come under the category of a to-be-confiscated weapon.”

That was it, the first important victory, as now, the proper vetting process could be started. Well, there is a lot of granular details about deadlines for applying for permission to possess swords of artistic value that were extended several times, and everything needed to be worded properly on the Japanese side for the Ministry of Education, Honma’s employer, to be on board, and there needed to be a Japanese committee with an appointed/elected chair and a panel of judges, etc., but which all shall be a topic for another article. In a nutshell, with Honma as head of that committee, with the Tōkyō National Museum as a headquarter, and with daily trips to Akabane, the first report of the vetting process was submitted to the GHQ in October of 1946, with another one in 1947, and with the final deadline being extended until February of 1948.

In course of all of this, and by drumming up so much support from the aforementioned Chūō Tōken Kai sword club members and many more from all walks of life, from ministers to local businessmen, everyone understood that something should come out of this all that shall not end with the final deadline… And this was the background for the foundation of the NBTHK, The Society for the Preservation of Japanese Art Swords, which came into being at that very time, in February of 1948. By the way, as this article is about Honma’s life, I also want to mention that in parallel, he was also named first director of the Honma Museum of Art (本間美術館) that had been established in his home town of Sakata by his younger brother Yūsuke (本間祐介, 1907–1983) in 1947.

Well, Honma, and Satō, stayed with their positions for the time being and the aforementioned Hosokawa Moritatsu was appointed first president of the NBTHK, which then went on its course by inaugurating their certification system for swords, fittings, and koshirae, in September of 1948, their monthly Tōken Bijutsu (刀剣美術) magazine in October of 1949, and their annual sword making contest, plus the opening of their sword museum and headquarters in May of 1968 in Yoyogi, relocating there from the offices of the Tōkyō National Museum.

Honma in 1963, age 59.

In 1950, the new Law for the Protection of Cultural Properties came into force, and the Agency for Cultural Affairs was established as an external bureau of the Ministry of Eduction. This was the occasion we usually refer to as “the new system,” when the designation of Jūyō-Bunkazai was introduced and the former Jūyō-Bijutsuhin and Kokuhō objects were re-assessed. Honma became the first director of the Fine Arts and Crafts Division of said agency, and stepped down in 1960 to serve henceforth as a member of their Council of Specialized Expert Consultants. It was a time when he focused more on his engagement with the NBTHK, writing articles for them, assisted with some of their groundbreaking exhibitions, and also lectured on a regular basis at many sword clubs and societies. Also, Honma fell ill and was hospitalized in 1960, and although he had not yet reached retirement age, he took that opportunity to leave early. He once wrote that his post as a director involved nothing but end to end meetings, leaving no time to study swords in any peaceful capacity.

When Hosokawa Moritatsu passed away in 1970, Honma became the second president of the NBTHK at the age of 66, which he held until 1981, passing on the baton to Fujikawa Kinji (富士川金二, 1903–1999). After that, Honma remained busy contributing articles, working on his Appraisal Diary, writing sayagaki, being an advisor for all kinds of nationwide exhibitions, and acting as an editor for many publications, just to name some activities. Incidentally, Satō had left the Tōkyō National Museum in 1969 to join the NBTHK as their Executive Secretary and later Managing Director, and also as their Deputy Director of the Sword Museum, working there alongside with Honma as the famous duo Ryōzan (両山), “The Two Zan” (because of their pen names Kunzan and Kanzan), until his passing in 1978.

Doing what he loved until the end, Honma Sensei passed away on August 29, 1991, 7:40 pm, age 87, of a heart failure at his home in Kugayama (久我山), Tōkyō.

HONMA’S APPRAISAL DIARY VOLUME 9

I would like to announced that we have arrived at Volume 9 of Honma’s Appraisal Diary. This volume, which covers the years 1981~1982, introduces on ca. 425 pages 295 blades, meaning we have now arrived at a total of about 3,400 pages of text and exactly 2,613 featured blades in this series. The price is $99, which includes shipping.

Thank you very much for your attention!

If you would like to order a copy, and/or have any questions, please PayPal said amount to, or reach out via: markus.sesko@gmail.com

PS: When this series is complete, we will have reached ca. 4,000 pages of text and ca. 3,000 introduced blades.

The index is linked below.

DTI eBook Super Sale

Once again, it goes directly via me (i.e. I’m not going to manually change all the prices on Lulu.com and then change them back when the sale is over). I provide a list of all my eBooks below, showing the regular and the reduced prices. I also linked them so that you can check what the description says but again, DO NOT buy over there at Lulu.com this time. Get in touch with me via “markus.sesko@gmail.com” and pay me directly, either by PayPal using the very same email address, by check, or by credit card using the donate button at the very bottom of this page, and I’m going to send you over the eBook. And anyway, if you gave a question, just drop me a mail.

Thank you for your attention!

Akasaka Tanko Roku ….. $8.90 – $4.50
Encyclopedia of Japanese Swords ….. $24.90 – $12.50
Geneaogies and Schools of Japanese Swordsmiths ….. $19.90 – $10
Genealogies of Japanese Toso Kinko Artists ….. $19,90 – $10
Identifying Japanese Cursive Script ….. $14.90 – $7.50
Identifying Japanese Seal Script ….. $14.90 – $7.50
Japan’s Most Important Sword Fittings ….. $14.90 – $7.50
Jukken ….. $14.90 – $7.50
Kano Natsuo I ….. $59.90 – $30
Kano Natsuo II ….. $59.90 – $30
Kantei Reference Book – Hamon & Boshi ….. $19.90 – $10
Koshirae – Japanese Sword Mountings ….. $19.90 – $10
Koshirae Taikan ….. $59.90 – $30
Koto Kantei Zenshu ….. $89.90 – $45
Koto Meikan ….. $39.90 – $20
Legends and Stories Around the Japanese Sword ….. $9.90 – $5
Legends and Stories Around the Japanese Sword 2 ….. $9.90 – $5
Masamune ….. $29.90 – $15
Masters of Keicho Shinto ….. $19.90 – $10
Nihon-koto-shi ….. $29.90 – $15
Nihon-shinto-shi ….. $29.90 – $15
Nihon-shinshinto-shi ….. $29.90 – $15
Shinshinto Meikan ….. $29.90 – $15
Shinto Meikan ….. $29.90 – $15
Shinto Shinshinto Kantei Zenshu ….. $89.90 – $45
Signatures of Japanese Sword Fittings Artists ….. $89.90 – $45
Soken Kinko Zufu ….. $9.90 – $5
Swordsmiths of Japan ….. $89.90 – $45
Tameshigiri ….. $29.90 – $15
The Honami Family ….. $19.90 – $10
The Japanese Toso Kinko Schools ….. $24.90 – $12.50

German Titles:

Die Honami Familie ….. $19.90 – $10
Geschichten rund ums japanische Schwert ….. $9.90 – $5
Geschichten rund ums japanische Schwert 2 ….. $9.90 – $5
Koto Kantei Zenshu ….. $89.90 – $45
Nihon-shinto-shi ….. $29.90 – $15
Nihon-shinshinto-shi ….. $29.90 – $15
Shinto Shinshinto Kantei Zenshu ….. $89.90 – $45

30 Years Anniversary

Time flies, as posted on my IG @swordtranslator last night:

I am not certain about the exact month, but it was in fall of 1995 that I bought a Japanese sword (a fake), which I mark as my official starting point into the field of Nihonto. Remember reading about Japanese swords in a book on edged weapons from around the world as a teenager that I think already hooked me up as it had a b/w drawing of a Masamune blade, but too vague to pin down. So, 30 years it is, and what a journey. Hope I am in for another 30 years as it only feels like a first step, but let’s see what my aging body has to say about that, lol 😇 Maybe after the next 30 years I feel comfortable enough for balloons and confetti…

正確な月は定かではありませんが、1995年の秋に日本刀(偽銘でしたが)を購入したのを、日本刀 の世界に正式に足を踏み入れた出発点としています。10代の頃に世界の刃物についての本を読んでいて、日本刀の章に載っていた正宗の刀の白黒図を見たのが、すでに心を掴まれたきっかけだったと思います。ただ、その記憶は曖昧すぎて特定できません。ともあれ、あれから30年。本当に長い旅路でした。まだ最初の一歩にすぎないように感じるので、あと30年はいけるといいのですが、まあ老いゆく身体がどう言うかは分かりませんね 😇 もしかしたら、さらに30年経った頃には、風船や紙吹雪でお祝いする心の余裕もできているかもしれません…

A dot, a dot! My kingdom for a dot!

Whilst working on the last few chapters of Volume 4 of the Tōsōgu Classroom, I came across a signature that made me scratch my head a little, but which I eventually figured out. So, I thought it is interesting enough to share here.

Stumbling block was Fukushi Shigeo Sensei making a reference to an en suite set of daishō fittings by Honjō Yoshitane (本荘義胤). Most of you likely know that Yoshitane was an engraver extraordinaire from the school of Taikei Naotane (大慶直胤, 1779–1857), who, apart from adding horimono to sword blades, also made tsuba and other sword fittings. In said reference, Fukushi quotes the signature of the fuchi as: “Sōō zuchū Yoshitane” (漱王図中義胤). This mei suggests that Yoshitane modelled the work after a painting/design (Japanese: zu, 図) of a certain Sōō (漱王). However, zuchū (図中), lit. “in the figure/illustration” as in “as shown in the figure/illustration” is odd and does not make much sense in this context. Also, who was Sōō? As “painting/design” is mentioned, the first thought it of course that Sōō was a painter, or, to be more precise, the art name () of a painter. A quick search, however, did not yield anything related, only an ancient Korean king named Hae Mo-su (解慕漱王). Very unlikey that its him that Yoshitane references in his signature…

Next step, as Fukushi mentions that the set is Jūyō, is to check the explanation in the respective Jūyō volume, Shinsa No. 22 from 1974 (see picture below). By the way, this set is only one of two works of Honjō Yoshitane that passed Jūyō (the other being a daishō-tsuba, Shinsa No. 62, 2016).

First thing that becomes obvious, Fukushi mis-quoted the signature of the fuchi, or it was a mistake in layout when that issue of the Tōken Bijutsu magazine was put together. Anyway, in the Jūyō volume, the NBTHK quotes the signature as: “Sōō enchū Yoshitane” (漱王園中義胤), “Yoshitane, in the Sōō Garden.” The mei makes a little more sense now, if you will, but raises the next question: Where is or was the Sōō Garden, which I had never heard of before?

As a new search didn’t yield much either, I double-checked the actual fuchi and its signature in the Jūyō volume, and lo and behold, the NBTHK mis-quoted the signature too! The blown up detail from the scan of that page shown below is not the best, but if you look closely, you can see that the mei actually begings with the character oite (於), and that there is a small dot towards the very right of the character ō (王), which makes it the character gyoku (玉) (hence the “stupid” title of this post). Also see how the right radical (欠) of the character for (漱) is also difficult to discern as it touches the seam of the lid of the fuchi.

With all this, I am pretty confident that the signature is: “Sōgyoku enchū ni oite, Yoshitane” (於漱玉園中義胤), “Yoshitane, in the Sōgyoku Garden.” And this also makes complete sense now as there actually was a Sōgyoku Garden, whose remains are located on the premises of the Sannōgū Hiyoshi-jinja (山王宮日吉神社) in Miyazu (宮津), Kyōto Prefecture. To provide some background, it is said that the garden was designed in Shōhō four (正保, 1647) by Kyōgoku Takahiro (京極高広, 1599–1677), the then Daimyō of the fief of Miyazu, and was later enlarged at the end of the 1670s by Nagai Naonaga (永井尚長, 1654–1680), who had become the Daimyō of Miyazu in 1674.

But this is not the end of the story, meaning, there is more to unravel here. Realizing that said garden is located in Miyazu immedately rang a bell in the context of the set being a work of Honjō Yoshitane. Some of you might now that Yoshitane’s master Taikei Naotane did some extensive traveling throughout his career, and he also produced blades in all the locations he visited. That is, reading of Miyazu, I immediately remembered some blades by Naotane that bear what is referred to as a “hot stamp” (koku’in, 刻印) in the shape of the character Miya (宮) (see some examples below). Naotane used several of these hot stamps to mark where he had produced blades apart from mentioning it in the signature.

From dated blades of Naotane and from written information provided by his student Hosoda Naomitsu (細田直光), better known as Kajihei (鍛冶平), we know that Naotane had been to Miyazu in Kaei two (嘉永, 1849). What is also interesting is that the daishō-tsuba of Yoshitane’s set are signed: “Taikei Naotane kore o kitaeru Morinobu no zu, Yoshitane” (大慶直胤鍛之守信図 義胤), “Yoshitane, after [Kanō] Morinobu, [plates] forged by Taikei Naotane.” So, we can assume that Yoshitane had accompanied Naotane on his trip to Miyazu in 1849, where he made the set of fittings, or at last parts of it, i.e., the fuchigashira, using plates for the tsuba that had been forged by his master.

In conclusion, I would like to say that sometimes difficult to interpret signatures, or such that are wrongly quoted, can lead to some nice revelations after some research. Also, now you know one of the many reason for why working on projects like the Tōsōgu Classroom takes so long (the other ones mostly being me 😇).

PS: Below is a sneak peek of an overview of Taikei Naotane’s travel destinations that will be elaborated on in an article on him I am still working on. Miyazu is the one marked 1849 on the north coast of Honshū.

HONMA’S APPRAISAL DIARY VOLUME 8

I would like to announced that we have arrived at Volume 8 of Honma’s Appraisal Diary. This volume, which covers the years 1979~1980, introduces on ca. 430 pages 317 blades, meaning we have now arrived at a total of about 3,000 pages of text and exactly 2,317 featured blades in this series. The price is $99, which includes shipping.

Thank you very much for your attention!

If you would like to order a copy, and/or have any questions, please PayPal said amount to, or reach out via: markus.sesko@gmail.com

PS: When this series is complete, we will have reached ca. 4,000 pages of text and ca. 3,000 introduced blades.

The index is linked below.

Norimune (則宗)

The other day, I posted on my IG (@swordtranslator) one of the only five surviving signed works by Norimune (則宗), who is regarded as the founder of the prestigious Fukuoka-Ichimonji (福岡一文字) School, and who was active 800! years ago, being traditionally dated around Jōgen (承元, 1207–1211). The blade I posted is the one that is in the Imperial collection (gyobutsu), which was once presented to Emperor Meiji (明治天皇, 1852–1912) by the Asano (浅野) family, and which is completely ubu.

So, for the sake of completeness, I thought I post the other four signed works of Norimune here, plus, of course, also the gyobutsu, which shall be introduced first. That said, please enjoy the line-up, and may this brief post serve as a reference for Fukuoka-Ichimonji Norimune for the one or other in the future.

Picture 1: Gyobutsu, tachi, mei: Norimune (則宗), nagasa 78.2 cm, sori 2.7 cm, ubu, former heirloom of the Asano (浅野) family.

Picture 2: Kokuhō, tachi, mei: Norimune (則宗), nagasa 78.5 cm, sori 2.6 cm, ubu, collection of Hie Shrine (日枝神社), once presented to said shrine by Tokugawa Tsunayoshi (徳川綱吉, 1646–1709).

Picture 3: Jūyō-Bunkazai, tachi, mei: Norimune (則宗), nagasa 80.1 cm, sori 3.3 cm, ubu, collection of Okayama Prefectural Museum, former heirloom of the Tsuchiya (土屋) family.

Picture 4: Jūyō-Bunkazai, tachi, mei: Norimune (則宗), nagasa 69.7 cm, sori 2.3 cm, suriage, collection of Mitsui Memorial Museum, former heirloom of the Tsuchiya (土屋) family.

Picture 5: Tokubetsu-Jūyō Tōken, tachi, mei: Norimune (則宗), nagasa 72.3 cm, sori 2.3 cm, ubu, private collection.

The picture above shows, roughly in proportion, a juxtaposition of these five blades (Picture 1~5, from left to right). Wouldn’t that be a once-in-a-lifetime display at a study meeting? 😇

But there is slightly more… Well, there is a leather-covered (kawazutsumi) tachi-koshirae designated as a Jūyō-Bunkazai (picture 6), which holds a blade signed “Norimune,” but which is described in the designation with the suffix mei ari (銘アリ), roughly meaning “inscribed,” rather than “signed.” In other words, the signature is possibly not authentic, or has not yet been authenticated (the sword was designated as a Jūyō-Bunkazai in 1950, by the way, and is owned by the Atago Shrine [愛宕神社], Kyōto).

Picture 6: Jūyō-Bunkazai, kawazutsumi tachi-koshirae, overall length 106.0 cm, Muromachi period, blade inscribed “Norimune.”

NBTHK Kanshō/Kantei Blades Analysis

In a recent conversation I had with a collector, the topic of the “uneven playing field” of available blades to study between Japan and outside of Japan came up. Obviously, the chances to study more (fine) blades and the ability to dip into a much greater pool of makers is vastly “skewed” towards Japan.

With this discussion as a context, I thought about how to put together some concrete data regarding this issue, and I mean, with students of Nihontō as focal point. First of all, I thought that the emphasis should be on opportunities of hands-on study and not just about which museums you can visit to see blades behind glass. Also, sword rotations at museums are often not announced, so it is a bit tricky to tell what one can see at any given moment.

All that said, most obvious choice for looking for tangible data is the NBTHK, as they publish the blades that are presented for Kantei and study at their monthly Tōkyō Teirei Kanshō (定例鑑賞, “Regular Appreciation”) meetings in the Tōken-Bijutsu magazine. One can attend these meetings by becoming a member, and I attended some in the early 2000s at their old place in Yoyogi.

So, my “data experiment” was as follows: Assuming you were the bestest boy/girl and attended every single monthly meeting the last 25 years, I wanted to know what blades you would have “under your belt” by now. With this, I created a spreadsheet that lists all the makers/schools featured across basically 300 meetings, that contains the usual era differentiation (K for Kotō, S for Shintō, and SS for Shinshintō), and that lists how often blades by a certain maker/school were on display, plus the actual number of blades by said maker/school as more or less regularly, the same blades are shown over the years. That is, if a smith has 10 for “No. of display” and 5 for “No. of blades” in the spreadsheet linked later, for example, it means that 5 of his works were out in 10 meetings, meaning that some were shown multiple times.

Disclaimer before we continue: Sometimes, meetings are not reported in the Tōken-Bijutsu magazine, or only the blades are briefly mentioned via just the name of the smith, e.g., “last month, we had a Hizen Tadayoshi, a Rai Kunimitsu…” As these omissions usually only happen once a year, and as I also wanted to focus on the concrete number of individual blades, which is impossible by just a name drop and not at least also mentioning nagasa, etc., I left those out in the spreadsheet. And then there was Covid, so there were no meetings and mostly just three blades were introduced in the magazine every month just to keep the tradition alive, if you will.

So, if you had attended ALL those aforementioned meetings over a span of 25 years, you would have seen about 850 blades by roughly 300 makers/schools, with the age distribution being about 200 Kotō, 80 Shintō, and 20 Shinshintō. The files linked below are PDFs of said spreadsheet, one in alphabetical order that makes finding a maker/school easier, one in descending order of makers/schools having been presented over the years and one in descending order the number of featured blades by the latter.

As you can see in the preview below, there are some of the “usual suspects” among the most featured makers/schools, but also some interesting quantities. For example, I would not have thought that the Õsaka-Shintō smith Oya-Kunisada (親国貞) constitutes number three. And he is also number two behind Kotetsu in terms of featured blades, on the same place with Tsuda Sukehiro (助広) and Seki Kansada (兼定).

As a bonus, I also added all the Kantei, referred to as Shijō Kantei (誌上鑑定), that were presented in the magazine over the last 25 years. Over these 25 years, roughly 240 blades by ca. 130 makers/schools were presented, meaning again that some were featured several times. The agre distribution in case of the Kantei blades is about 70 Kotō, 40 Shintō, and 20 Shinshintō. Again, I am linking three PDFs, one in alphabetical order and two regarding the occasions and number of blades, respectively. Incidentally, I also added the Tōken-Bijutsu numbers in case you want to find a certain Kantei blade.

Interesting here is that the top two makers put out for Kantei are Hizen Tadahiro (忠広) and Osafune Motoshige (元重), and also that Hizen Yukihiro (行広) is so high up there being presented six times over the years.

That said, I hope you enjoy going through the lists, and maybe they confirm (or dismiss) a hunch one had about what blades were out for hands-on study at the NBTHK over the last 25 years.

Hachisuka Daimyō Patronage

The title of this short article is not really catchy, but I didn’t want to say “yet another interesting blade” again. In any case, what got the ball rolling, if you will, is the blade shown in picture 1 below, a wakizashi made by a little known local swordsmith, but more on this later, because as always, I would like to start with some historical background.

Picture 1: Wakizashi, mei: Ishikawa Masanao saku (石川正直作), kinzōgan-mei: Horie Okinari + kaō (堀江興成「花押」). Nagasa 40.0 cm, sori 1.2 cm.

For a better understanding of the context, we have to go back to the summer of Hōreki four (宝暦, 1754). Hachisuka Yoshihisa (蜂須賀至央, 1737–1754), then only 17 years old and holding the office of ninth Daimyō of the Tokushima fief (徳島藩) in Awa province on Shikoku for less than two months, was about to die. As he had no son yet, he adopted on his deathbed Satake Yoshisue (佐竹義居, 1738–1801), the fourth son of the Daimyō of the quite distant Iwasaki fief (岩崎藩) in Dewa province, Satake Yoshimichi (佐竹義道, 1701–1765) (Picture 2). So, Yoshisue found himself as newly fledged Daimyō being himself only 16 years old (or 17, according to the then Japanese way of counting one’s age), adopting the name Hachisuka Masatane (蜂須賀政胤). All this took place in Edo, not in Awa province, which Yoshisue/Masatane visited for the first time in the fourth month of Hōreki five (1755) after having his genpuku ceremony and having changed his name one last time to Hachisuka Shigeyoshi (蜂須賀重喜) (Picture 3).

Picture 2: Map with relevant places.

Shigeyoshi entered his rule at a time when after the affluent Genroku era (元禄, 1688–1704), the Shōgunate and most of the fiefs realized they had to tighten their belts. With the eighth Tokugawa Shōgun Yoshimune (徳川吉宗, 1684–1751) at the forefront, it was a time of widespread reforms all across the country. Accordingly, also Shigeyoshi wanted to improve the financial situation of his fief. He initiated a barrage of measures, with one of them being the patronage of the arts and crafts in order to stimulate his economy.“Good for us,” Shigeyoshi had a fondness for swords and sword fittings. So, what he did was sending some of his most promising swordsmiths to Edo to study with masters like Suishinshi Masahide (水心子正秀, 1750–1825) and Ozaki Suketaka (尾崎助隆, 1753–1805), one of them being the maker of the blade in question shown in picture 1, Ishikawa Masanao (石川正直).

Picture 3: Hachisuka Shigeyoshi.

Masanao had made said blade after his stay with Suishinshi Masahide and had presented it to his Daimyō Shigeyoshi, who is said to have cherished it a lot. I also want to point out a nice little detail: The dragon horimono on the omote side of the blade bears centrally the encircled swastika crest of the Hachisuka family (Picture 4, left). Also, it is safe to assume that Masanao had engraved the horimono himself as a gassaku (joint work) between him and his father (or older brother, depending on the source) Ishikawa Masamori (石川正守) exists, which is inscribed: “Ashū Ishikawa Masamori tsukuru – Kansei jūnen nigatsu hi, Ishikawa Masanao horu” (阿州石川正守造・寛政十年二月日、石川正直彫) – “Made by Ishikawa Masamori from Awa province on a day of the second month Kansei ten (1798), engraved by Ishikawa Masanao” (Picture 4, right).

Picture 4

All that said, what caught my attention with this blade is the fact that it bears the kinzōgan-mei “Horie Okinari + kaō” (堀江興成「花押」). Some of you might have heard this name as Horie Okinari (?–1844?) was a famous Kinkō master, who had trained with Hamano Shōzui (浜野政随, 1696–1769), with the Ōmori (大森) School, and with Ozaki Naomasa (尾崎直政, 1732–1782). What ties everything together is that Okinari was also employed by the Hachisuka family, as part of said patronage in order to stimulate the economy of the Tokushima fief. Even if Shigeyoshi was removed from power relatively early in his rule, more on this in a second, I tend to think that Okinari was hired by Shigeyoshi himself. Reason for this assumption is that Shigeyoshi gifted the very blade introduced in this article at some point to Okinari, who is said to have inlaid his name and monogram in gold on the tang himself. Or, the gift came later by the retired Shigeyoshi as a reward for the longstanding service Okinari provided for the fief.

Anyhow, we have here another case where a sword (or a sword fitting) can unravel so much historical context, if you dig. Research of this kind, and provenance research in general, is a part of my service that I really enjoy, and I encourage everyone who has a Japanese arms and armor object that is engraved/inscribed with a name to dig, and I don’t say that as a shameless business plug!

All that said, I would like to conclude with narrating the remainder of Hachisuke Shigeyoshi’s life. As indicated, he was removed from power, and that was in Meiwa six (明和, 1769) after 15 years into his tenure as a Daimyō and on orders of the Shōgunate, which forced him to retire, as it was of the opinion that his fief reform measures were not as successful as desired. So, the year after his removal from office, Shigeyoshi moved back to Edo, but returned once again to Tokushima in An’ei two (安永, 1773) for a medical treatment. After recovering, however, he lived quite the high live down on Shikoku, which once again upset the Shōgunate, which wanted him to come back to Edo to live in house arrest in the Edo residence of the Tokushima fief to enable a more effective Bakufu supervision. Well, Shigeyoshi was able to avoid that by moving to a different local residence in Awa province, where he eventually died in Kyōwa one (享和, 1801) at the age of 64.

Last but not least, I wanted to add that Shigeyoshi was also “otherwise” quite active. He had 16 sons and 14 daughters with his wife Tsutehime (伝姫 , 1737–1802) and with his concubines, of which there were at least four.